The Perfect Fantasy Football System

Frustrated by constantly following the hype train to inconsistent rankings? Use RSJ's Fantasy Football Stock Rating System and avoid these issues forevermore!

The Parallels, and Differences, Between Wall and Roto Street

I am no “Wall Street Guru.” I don’t know any fancy stock market jargon (except, of course, that I’m the BSD of fantasy). Hell, I can’t even make it through a weekend with burning through a few hundred — my disastrous Wrestlemania fiasco as glaring proof.

So while I can’t even pretend to know my way around Wall Street, I still realize that fantasy football is its own little stock market: you’re investing principle (a draft pick or auction dollars) into stocks (players) by judging their upside or downside (fantasy ceilings and floors), choosing the right time (round) to buy this stock, ultimately creating a portfolio (fantasy team) that maximizes its return potential (fantasy point scoring).

In other words, success on Roto Street is also all about knowing who/what to buy, why to buy it, and when to invest. Instead of red and green arrows on a board, however, we get to watch the greatest, most entertaining game ever created. All the one-handed catches. Every insane broken tackle. The end-zone toe taps. All split into Quad Boxes of delight and narrated with the utmost enthusiasm from Scott Hanson; as if God heard all of the fantasy nerds’ prayers and turned the old “Yahoo StatTracker” into its own television channel and gave it the most appropriate title ever, “Red Zone.”

rsj red zone

But besides the sheer entertainment factor, another key difference in these markets is actual predictability. As Matthew McConaughey explains during the best five minutes of The Wolf of Wall Street: “First rule of Wall Street – Nobody – and I don’t care if you’re Warren Buffet or Jimmy Buffet – nobody knows if a stock is going up, down or fucking sideways, least of all stockbrokers. But we have to pretend we know.”

Well, in the fantasy football world, you don’t have to pretend.

Sure, injuries, unforeseen depth chart moves, and misjudgments make batting 100% impossible. But while my addiction has rendered me borderline socially inept in the real world,  it’s let me become The Leonardo of Roto Street.

This is in many thanks due to my Fantasy Stock System. The more I’ve researched and done this, the more clear it’s become: fantasy value circles around five certain factors. When these areas are considered together and players are viewed objectively as a “stock,” hitting on 75%+ on your fantasy picks becomes much more realistic.

The Five Factors that Drive Fantasy Success (or Failure)

Without further adieu, the five factors that create the fantasy ceiling and floor of a player are:

  • Talent
  • Opportunity / Expected Usage
  • Coaching Scheme / System
  • Surrounding Talent
  • Risk Level

Now, I know none of these factors are groundbreaking, crazy discoveries in the fantasy world. And of course other areas, such as the matchup need to be considered once the season has started, especially for DFS. But never before have all five variables been considered as one unit — a Stock Score –to holistically predict fantasy value with all the important areas considered.

Below are some brief descriptions of what I analyze and look for in each of the categories:



Talent is simply a player’s sheer ability and skill level when on the field. There seems to be a wide split in the fantasy community with how to best evaluate and predict talent: either you’re a stats guy, or a film guy. Personally, I place more stock in “the eyeball test” when assessing talent, instead of some random algorithm that generates net expected points when someone’s shoe is untied. To each their own.

Instead, I like to ask: what players are popping off the tape compared to those around them?

Which running backs have that vision to see the hole before it opens and create for themselves when a gap doesn’t emerge?  Can they contribute on all three downs and in the red zone?

Which receivers or tight ends are silky-smooth in and out of their breaks, always finding the soft spot in a zone? Which ones can dominate a contested one-on-one ball, or make the difficult catch in traffic? Who’s breaking away from defenders once the ball’s in his hands?

Can the quarterback make all the throws? Is his decision making sound as he goes through his progressions in the face of pressure?

Yet, even with an emphasis on film, I still see plenty of value to certain stats. Knowing what runners led the league in broken tackles, or what receivers had the strongest catch % and who’s being targeted the most — these stats can all help flesh out what the tape was suggesting, or lead to talent you weren’t initially aware of.

10’s are assigned to the highest skilled players at their position — the Antonios, Newtons, and Gronks of the world. From there, descending scores obviously reflect a decrease in ability level. As we have seen before, often times even a 8-9 level talent can frustratingly rot behind an aging, ineffective veteran if he’s not earned the right….

Opportunity / Usage:

Few words draw fantasy wood faster than “every-down workhorse” or “target hog.” The more frequent the usage, the greater opportunity the player has to score points. These type of high-usage players, like a healthy Le’Veon, receive the 10 scores.

Oftentimes, the most common and obvious reason to a breakout campaign is just a higher usage rate. Whether a player is emerging from a retired veterans shadow (re: Golden Tate or Thomas Rawls), or a running back lands in a prime spot (re: Lamar Miller), it’s crucial to monitor landing spots and depth chart movement.

Too often, however, experts will stop the equation here. Talent + Opportunity = Fantasy Gold, right? Not so fast. 20 uncreative carries straight into the line won’t facilitate a monstrous year, just like the stud WR who rots in a run-heavy scheme. We also need to consider…

Offensive Scheme / System: 

Nothing can boost a value like a creative, offensive mind who schemes to his players skillsets. The longer an offense remains on the field, and the more frequently they are in the red area, the greater chance players have for fantasy points. These type of coaches, like a Bruce Arians, help players achieve 10 scores.

Similarly, a coach that jams square pegs into round holes and uses vanilla schemes can anchor even a talented player with a clear-cut role. Sure, there are some talents that can transcend poor schemes, but these are rare and usually the most expensive investments on draft day. Thus, we need to track coaching and coordinator changes, and examine the new playcalling tendencies that come with them.

Yet, even when a talented player is given an opportunity in a strongly devised scheme, to have guaranteed success they must also have strong:

Surrounding Talent 

Surrounding Talent is simply the quality levels of a players’ supporting cast. Look at Golden Tate, who’s score gets a boost after his main competition for targets went from a man named Megatron to a guy named Marvin.  And in that same breath, Matthew Stafford’s Surrounding Talent score is plummeting As Darren McFadden and Joseph Randle can attest, offensive lines also need to be heavily factored into this equation, especially for runners.

In general, high-end surrounding talent always raises a player’s fantasy stock score. You want the players on juggernaut teams that’ll exploding for points. You want the back running behind some elite maulers. A subpar quarterback can sometimes chuck his way into sleeper value if he’s got strong playmakers on the outside. As Wes Welker has shown, a decent wide receiver can become elite with the right right quarterback upgrade. These players with value-boosting supporting casts receive 10s in this department.


Vernon Davis fully understands the value of a strong supporting cast


But as quickly as a ceiling can be elevated by strong surrounding talent, a cavernous fantasy floor can be created by a weak supporting cast. A trash quarterback can often plummet a wide receivers value and motivation, right Dez? Losing a stud on the outside can leave a QB gasping for fantasy air, like Brady after Gronk, Edelman, and Lewis went down. A horrible offensive line can leave even a talented runner hitting brick walls; the box may be stacked against him if no vertical threat or quarterback relieves some pressure. Surrounding Talent scores are lowered to reflect these value-reducing teammates.

But even if the storm is perfect, and all these factors are ranked at their peak, we still need to consider…

Risk Level: 

Risk Level is determined by looking at three factors: injury susceptibility / history, consistency, and proven-ness. The higher the score, the safer the investment. A 10 would mean a player is close to risk-free: an established commodity that displays iron-man health and match-up proof consistency. Think Antonio Brown.

Indeed injuries are impossible to predict; every single player is on the same field with seemingly equal risk on any given play. Yet, some identifiable trends do exist that certainly make some players more injury prone than others. High mileage or older running backs often breakdown, and runners in general are at a higher risk given their greater exposure to hits. Style of play, such as an upright rushing style or fearlessness over the middle, can also create greater injury susceptibility. Previous injury history also needs to be considered, particularly if a player is coming off a surgery.


Out of all the shocking 2015 developments…


While injury is by far the greatest factor to consider, consistency is its near equal for risk assessment. Do you have a Julian Edelman who seems a near lock for 15+ ppr points a week, keeping your weekly floor high? Or are you tossing out Desean Jackson who may produce a week-winning 30 point bonanza and then cost you three matchups with goose eggs?

Proven durability is comforting, as the players we see hold up tend to do so every year. Plus, once your established, you generally have a longer leash and more role clarity. By no means does this mean only draft proven commodities. More often than not, these ceilings are often more firmly established, and while security has its own appeal, there’s often more sexiness to the allure of the unknown. A balance between the established versus the potential is key to being a true contender.

We’re On to 2016

We all want predictions that are as well-informed and educated as possible. The RSJ’s “Fantasy Stock System” system ensures all necessary angles are considered, making draft preparation more consistent and comprehensive.

But another major benefit is the simplicity and adaptability. Feel free to customize your own scores if you disagree with my assessment:

Think I’m too bullish on a coach’s impact? See talent or risk where I don’t? Fair enough. I’m certainly not flawless, but this scouting lens is pretty damn close. Use the same tool, but make the evaluation your own. Once you’ve started using our formula for holistic evaluation, this will be you to you’re come December: flipping-off-leo.gif

And acting like this for all of January (until you’ve blown through all your winnings):

money-throwing leo.gif

Here’s to investing wisely and making this a reality for 2016.

–The Wolf of Roto Street


  • Founder of Roto Street Journal. Lover of workhorse backs, target hog wideouts, and Game of Thrones. Aspiring to be the "Brady" and "Leo" of the fantasy universe.


Most Popular